STUD.com
← Objectives

Build · Assess & Decide · Ops & Automation

Structured hiring decision scorecard

A structured scorecard where each interviewer's vote and rationale are recorded and the final verdict provably follows your decision rule (no after-the-fact rationalization).

You receive: A structured scorecard (JSON) that passes the completeness + decision-rule-consistency checks.

Part of Lead Team

Opens soon

Cost15 credits
AcceptanceAutomated check against your inputs
ProtectionHeld until verified delivery

This objective is verified and ready. It opens soon, once sign-in and payments are live.

Deliverable interface

The exact vocabulary the automated check enforces: keys, tokens, entry points, and worked examples. Generated from the verification source.

{
 "buyerParamKeys": [
  "decision_rule",
  "require_work_audition"
 ],
 "checkNames": [
  "format_parses",
  "candidate_present",
  "interviewer_count",
  "votes_valid",
  "rationale_len",
  "interviewer_named",
  "red_flags_wellformed",
  "final_verdict_consistency",
  "work_audition_present"
 ],
 "constants": {
  "_HIRE_RULES": [
   "any_strong_no_blocks",
   "majority",
   "unanimous"
  ],
  "_HIRE_VOTES": [
   "hire",
   "no_hire"
  ],
  "_HIRE_WORK_RESULT": [
   "fail",
   "mixed",
   "pass"
  ]
 },
 "deliverableLabel": "hiring_decision_scorecard",
 "documentKeys": [
  "candidate",
  "final_verdict",
  "interviewers",
  "name",
  "rationale",
  "red_flags",
  "result",
  "task",
  "vote",
  "work_trial"
 ],
 "enumLiterals": [
  [
   "yes",
   "true",
   "1"
  ]
 ],
 "submission": "a JSON document (submitted as a string), validated as data; every check below must pass",
 "tier": "doc-validator"
}

Example

A sample of what this objective produces. Your result is generated for your inputs.

Role

Senior Backend Engineer

Decision rule

majority

Verdict

advance

Rule satisfied

true

Interviewers

A. Cho

Voteyes
Focussystem design
RationaleDesigned a clean sharding scheme under load with strong tradeoff reasoning.

B. Mensah

Voteyes
Focuscoding
RationaleSolved the concurrency task with tests; readable, well-factored code.

C. Ito

Voteno
Focusownership
RationaleThin examples of driving a project end to end; would want more evidence.

Tally

Yes2
No1

Note

2 of 3 voted yes; the majority rule is satisfied and the rationale is recorded per interviewer.

Get early access to STUD the day it goes live.