Inventory · Create · Writing & Content

Scored brickyard inventory of demand-and-trust touchpoints

I get a structured brickyard: every brick sorted into the five areas (online presence, content, offerings, ecosystem, internal team), scored on the three fixed dimensions, with a ready/cracked/missing status per brick and per-area counts that match the bricks, ready to assemble into a journey.

You receive: A JSON object { product: string, bricks: [ { name (unique, 3+ characters), area (enum: online_presence|content|offerings|ecosystem|internal_team), create_demand (enum: yes|somewhat|no|na), build_trust (enum: yes|somewhat|no|na), potential_impact (enum: positive|neutral|negative|na), status (enum: ready|cracked|missing) } ], area_counts: {..per area, matching the bricks..} }

Part of Distribution, Grow Partnerships

What's verified: STUD verifies the deliverable is a JSON brickyard object under 100,000 characters with a non-empty bricks array; that every brick has a real name (3 or more characters, unique across the inventory) and a valid area, create-demand, build-trust, potential-impact, and status value from the fixed enums; that all five areas are covered with at least your minimum (1 to 10) and at most 10 bricks per area; that the area_counts summary matches a recount of the bricks; and, only when you set the partner toggle to yes, that at least one ecosystem brick names a partner, reseller, distributor, dealer, agency, or channel asset. STUD does NOT verify that the inventory covers every real touchpoint of your business, that the scores or statuses reflect reality, or that every asset you listed was used: the product, target customer, and asset list you provide are operator context for the work, not enforced acceptance criteria.