Build · Create · Engineering
Technical debt remediation sequence register
The founder gets a structured remediation register that buckets each debt item into fix-before-release / parallel-with-features / acceptable-ongoing, tags its weakness type, and orders the must-fix set, turning a flat audit list into a sequenced remediation plan.
You receive: A JSON object: { items: [{ itemId, description, weaknessType: enum(brittleness|thin_test_coverage|security_shortcut|structural_incoherence|dependency_risk), bucket: enum(fix_before_release|parallel_with_features|acceptable_ongoing), severity: enum(low|medium|high), fixOrder: number }], bucketCounts: { fix_before_release, parallel_with_features, acceptable_ongoing }, mustFixSequence: [itemId...] }
Part of Choose Business Model
What you receive
The shape of your delivered file. Your result is generated for your inputs.
Your deliverable is a structured document carrying these fields:
- Bucket
- Bucket Counts
- Description
- Fix Order
- Item Id
- Items
- Must Fix Sequence
- Severity
- Weakness Type
Some fields carry set values, drawn from:
brittleness, thin_test_coverage, security_shortcut, structural_incoherence, dependency_risk
fix_before_release, parallel_with_features, acceptable_ongoing
low, medium, high
security_shortcut, dependency_risk
yes, true, 1
Opens soon
STUD opens runs for everyone soon, on every play at once.
Scope of the check
What's verified: STUD verifies the register is complete and internally consistent: minimum item count, every item bucketed and severity-tagged, high-severity items forced into fix-before-release (if required), the must-fix order well-formed and contiguous, and tallies/sequence matching the data. STUD does NOT verify the debt items are real, that the severity ratings are accurate, or that fixing them in this order is optimal. It checks the triage's structural validity, not engineering judgment.
Get early access to STUD the day it goes live.