Pick · Assess & Decide · Analysis & Finance

Pick the inner-circle channels to test now

I get a short, focused list of inner-circle channels to test now, each with a written reason it earned a slot, so I run experiments instead of debating the whole menu.

You receive: A JSON object { picks: [{ channel, rationale }] } naming the channels to test now, each with a rationale of at least 6 words.

Part of Distribution

What's verified: STUD verifies that the deliverable is a JSON object within a 20000 character size bound, that it contains a picks list with exactly the requested number of picks (pickCount, 1 to 10; an out-of-range request falls back to 3), that every pick names one of the 19 canonical traction channels with no duplicates and no invented channels, and that every pick carries a rationale of at least 6 words that is not a placeholder like TBD. STUD does NOT verify that the picked channels are actually the best fit for your product, that the rationales are true or well reasoned, or that the picks reflect your intake answers: your product description, target customer, stage, and channels already tried are operator context, not enforced acceptance criteria.