STUD
← Plays

Build · Create · Ops & Automation

Reference-check call script and scorecard

A structured reference-check script with a confidentiality preamble, probing questions, and a numeric endorsement scorecard.

You receive: A JSON object: { candidate_label, role_title, confidentiality_preamble_field, relationship_question_field, questions[] (each {prompt, probes_for enum: strengths-weaknesses|reliability|open-mindedness|collaboration|other, followup_field}), endorsement_capture {scale_min, scale_max, why_required bool}, scorecard_fields {summary, recommendation enum: strong-yes|yes|reservations|no} }.

Part of Lead Team

Opens soon

Cost20 credits
ProtectionHeld until verified delivery

This play is verified and ready. It opens soon, once sign-in and payments are live.

Example

A sample of what this play produces. Your result is generated for your inputs.

Candidate label

Jordan Ellis

Role title

Senior Backend Engineer

Confidentiality preamble field

Thanks for making time today. This call is confidential: nothing you say will be shared with Jordan, and your name will not be attached to any notes that leave this conversation. I want to ask some direct questions about working with Jordan, and I would rather hear a candid, mixed picture than a polished one. Are you comfortable with that?

Relationship question field

Before we get into specifics, tell me how you worked with Jordan: your role at the time, how long you overlapped, and whether you were their manager, peer, or direct report.

Questions

PromptProbes forFollowup field
Walk me through a project where Jordan owned a backend system end to end. What was strong about their approach, and what would you have wanted done differently?strengths-weaknessesIf they only mention strengths: what is one thing Jordan themselves would admit they need to work on?
Describe a time Jordan committed to a deadline or an on-call responsibility. Did they follow through, and how did they communicate if something slipped?reliabilityWas there ever a time they missed a commitment without flagging it early? What happened next?
Tell me about a time someone challenged one of Jordan's technical decisions or code review comments. How did they respond in the moment?open-mindednessDid their position change, or did they hold firm? Looking back, was that the right call?
How did Jordan work with people outside engineering, like product managers or support? Give me one specific example.collaborationWas there ever friction with a non-engineering partner, and how did it get resolved?
Among engineers at Jordan's level that you have worked with, where would you rank them, and why?otherWhat would move them up a notch from where they are today?
If Jordan asked you directly what they should improve before starting a new role, what would you tell them?strengths-weaknessesIs that a coaching gap they can close quickly, or something more fundamental?

Endorsement capture

Scale min1
Scale max10
Why requiredtrue

Scorecard fields

SummaryReference confirmed strong technical ownership and sound judgment under review, consistent follow-through on commitments, and a track record of taking feedback well. The reference could not point to a significant weakness beyond wanting Jordan to delegate more of the routine work.
Recommendationyes

Closing field

That covers everything I needed to ask. Thank you for the candid answers, this is genuinely useful for our decision. Is there anything else about working with Jordan that you think I should know before we wrap up?

Get early access to STUD the day it goes live.